| Familial
Intracranial Aneurysms: Recurrence Risk and Accidental Aggregation
Study
Jean
Mathieu, Gilles Hébert, Louis Pérusse, Claude
Prévost, Léo Cantin, Jean-Marie Bouchard and Marc
DeBraekeleer
Abstract:
Background: The Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (SLSJ) region
is a geographically isolated area (population 285,955) located
in the Northeastern part of the Province of Quebec, Canada.
Using a population-based register, the genealogical reconstruction
of 502 individuals with ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA)
showed a familial aggregation (the presence of aneurysm in two
or more first- to third-degree relatives) for 144 (28.7%) of
them; this proportion is much higher than reported elsewhere.
Objective: In order to assess the genetic predisposition
to RIA in the SLSJ population, the objective of the present
study is to compare familial and non-familial cases and to provide
an estimate of the recurrence risk ratio for siblings. Results:
The age at the time of rupture, the number of intracranial aneurysms
for each patient and the location of RIAs were not statistically
different in the familial versus the non-familial group. Of
the 3449 siblings, 20 (0.58%) had suffered a RIA. The recurrence
risk ratio calculated for siblings (defined as the risk of disease
among siblings divided by the estimated population prevalence)
is 1.6 (CI 95% 1.0 - 2.4). In other respects, we observed very
large kinships in the SLSJ population, with an average number
of siblings of 7.2 (SD ± 3.4), ranging from 0 to 17 individuals.
With such large families and on the basis of chance alone, we
expected 31.3% of the patients to have at least one first- to
third-degree relative with RIA. Conclusion: These
data show that siblings of patients with RIA in the SLSJ population
have a greater risk of RIA than the general population. Nevertheless,
the largest part of the familial occurrence observed in the
SLSJ region can be explained by accidental aggregation, due
to large kinships. We propose that, in this population, an underlying
genetic predisposition must be suspected only when three or
more cases of RIA are identified among first- to third-degree
relatives.
|
Can.
J. Neurol. Sci. 1997; 24: 326-331
|
|